No community start suggestion yet.
Why do we treat safek berachos l'kula for birchas hamitzvah but l'chumrah for birchas hanehenin? The shiur analyzes the Tosafos (תוספות) position that birchas hanehenin stems from svar (rational obligation) rather than biblical derivation - we inherently must ask permission before benefiting from Hashem (ה׳)'s world. This creates an issur framework that explains stricter standards for food blessings versus mitzvah (מצוה) blessings.
This shiur provides a comprehensive analysis of Berachos 35a, focusing on the fundamental machloket between Tosafos (תוספות) and other Rishonim regarding the nature of our obligation to make blessings. The discussion begins with Rabbi Kivega's position that safek berachos l'kula doesn't apply to birchas hanehenin because eating without a bracha constitutes an issur - it's forbidden to eat without permission. This contrasts with birchas hamitzvah where safek berachos l'kula does apply. The Gemara (גמרא)'s opening question of 'mina hani milli' (from where do we derive this) becomes central to understanding whether blessings stem from svar (rational understanding) or require biblical derivation. Tosafos argues that svar alone can create obligations - we inherently understand that one must ask permission before benefiting from Hashem (ה׳)'s world. This svar is machayav (obligating) and doesn't require additional scriptural support.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does saying Ashrei three times daily guarantee a share in the World to Come? The verse 'umasbia l'chol chai ratzon' reveals that God provides not just sustenance but pleasure to all creation out of pure love. This recognition teaches us that even basic needs are expressions of divine chesed, creating the foundation for love-motivated service through both major and minor mitzvos.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Berachos 35a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Should one learn Torah full-time trusting in Divine providence, or combine learning with work? The shiur distinguishes between Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai's approach of complete separation from worldly concerns versus Rabbi Shmuel's view that proper work itself becomes part of Torah. The key insight: true emunah means learning without demanding sustenance from either Hashem or community, unlike having a 'contract' expecting payment for learning.
