No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) split the laws of murder across three pesukim (21:12-14), inserting the laws of accidental killing between them? The shiur develops the yesod that murder operates on two distinct legal theories: the court's authority (requiring full due process) and the king's authority (protecting society and divine sovereignty). This dual framework explains why murder alone empowers the Jewish king to execute even without standard halachic requirements.
Rabbi Zweig addresses the structural difficulties in Parshas Mishpatim's presentation of murder laws across pesukim 21:12-14. The Torah (תורה) appears to present incomplete elements of murder in pasuk 12 ("makeh ish vameis mos yumas"), inserts laws of accidental killing in pasuk 13, then adds critical elements like intentionality in pasuk 14. Rashi (רש"י) notes that pasuk 12's language suggests even a minor perpetrator would be liable, and even killing a non-Jew would qualify—conclusions the Maharal finds impossible as a straightforward reading. The resolution begins with the Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Rotzeach 4:8, which establishes that murderers who cannot be executed by the court due to technical deficiencies (lacking proper witnesses or warning) are nevertheless killed through "machnis oso l'kippah"—isolation with minimal sustenance until death. Crucially, this applies only to murder, not to other capital offenses like Shabbos (שבת) desecration or idolatry. The Rambam explains that while other sins may be more severe religiously, murder uniquely destroys society because it is "bein adam l'chavero"—an interpersonal crime affecting the victim and community, not just a sin against God.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Mishpatim 21:12-14
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
