No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Parshas Mishpatim require teaching the reasons (ta'amei hamitzvos) when the rest of Torah (תורה) requires only knowing the laws? The shiur develops that Mishpatim represent obligations we owe to ourselves, not just to Hashem (ה׳)—they must become internalized through understanding. This explains why going to secular courts is forbidden even when their laws match ours: only Torah courts can convey the ta'amim that transform law into self-obligation.
Rabbi Zweig addresses fundamental questions about Parshas Mishpatim that reveal a revolutionary understanding of social law in Torah (תורה). The parsha begins with difficulties: Why does the connecting vav suggest these laws might not be from Sinai? Why start with the remote case of eved ivri rather than basic theft laws? Why does selling a thief seem so harsh? And why is the law about Sanhedrin being near the Mizbeach placed here? The shiur's central insight emerges from Rashi (רש"י)'s statement that in Mishpatim, unlike the rest of Torah, Moshe Rabbeinu was commanded not just to teach the laws clearly but to explain the reasons—ta'amei hamitzvos. The laws had to be presented like a shulchan aruch, a set table that people would look forward to, not just dry regulations. This required tremendous effort from Moshe to understand and convey the underlying reasons in ways that would resonate with each person.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Mishpatim, Exodus 21-24
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
