No community start suggestion yet.
Should one recite shehecheyanu at a bris milah when the child experiences pain? The Rambam (רמב"ם)'s timing provides the answer: shehecheyanu is not recited on the painful act of circumcision itself, but on the child's joyful new status as a ba'al bris. This distinction resolves the apparent conflict with those who oppose the blessing due to the child's suffering.
This shiur examines the halachic question of whether to recite the blessing of shehecheyanu at a bris milah. The Rambam (רמב"ם) rules that one should make a birkas shehecheyanu on milah, a position that is codified by the Mechaber in Shulchan Aruch. However, the Hagahos Maimoniyos cites Rabbeinu Simcha who disagrees, arguing that no shehecheyanu should be recited because, as Tosafos (תוספות) explains, the circumcision involves tzara d'yankah (suffering of the child). Since shehecheyanu is specifically for occasions of joy and simcha, and while the parents may be joyful, the child is experiencing pain, Rabbeinu Simcha holds that the blessing is inappropriate. The shiur addresses an apparent inconsistency in the Rambam's rulings. In Hilchos Pidyon HaBen, the Rambam rules that one makes the primary berachah followed immediately by shehecheyanu before performing the pidyon. However, in Hilchos Milah, the Rambam does not mention this sequence, creating a need for explanation (hesber) about why the timing differs between these two mitzvos.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Hilchos Milah, Hilchos Pidyon HaBen
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Halacha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Can korbanos be brought when the Beis Hamikdash is destroyed? The Rambam and Raavad debate whether "Hashem es Mikdasham" creates a din of Avoda during Churban. Rabbi Zweig develops a distinction: the Rambam holds kedusha Rishona enabled both korbanos and tefillah; the Raavad holds only tefillah remains when the edifice is gone, since Hashem's presence endures even without a physical structure.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
Why does the Rambam rule that one may not violate even a shvus (rabbinic prohibition) on Yom Tov to obtain a shofar, yet permit shofar blowing on Shabbos Rosh Hashanah despite the gezeirah of carrying it to an expert? The Lechem Mishneh wrestles with an apparent contradiction: in Hilchos Shofar 1:4 the Rambam treats shvus like a full lav vis-à-vis the mitzvah of shofar, but in 2:6 he allows shofar on Shabbos even though it involves overriding both a lav and an asei.
When is a melacha on Yom Tov permitted? The shiur develops the Rambam's three-tiered framework distinguishing melachos that are food preparation itself (always permitted), food processing (permitted only l'tzorech achilah), and non-food melachos (always forbidden). The Magid Mishneh's explanation of "ho'il" emerges: intention cannot create a melacha where the act itself is inherently permitted.
