No community start suggestion yet.
Why doesn't olive oil drunk plain require a bracha, but oil mixed with vegetables for medicinal purposes requires borei pri ha'etz? The fundamental dispute between Rashi (רש"י) and the Rambam (רמב"ם) reveals whether brachos require actual achila (eating) or whether any hana'ah (benefit) suffices. This yesod reshapes how we understand the bracha requirements for all harmful substances that provide therapeutic benefit.
This shiur provides an extensive analysis of the complex halachos surrounding brachos on olive oil (shemen zayis), primarily based on Masechta Brachos 35b. The discussion begins with the Mechaber's ruling that drinking olive oil plain requires no bracha because it is harmful (mazik), but when mixed with vegetables for medicinal purposes (choshesh b'grono), one makes a borei pri ha'etz on the oil since it becomes the primary component (ikar). A fundamental dispute emerges between Rashi (רש"י) and the Rambam (רמב"ם) regarding the underlying principles. The Bach identifies the Rambam's source in Gemara (גמרא) Shabbos (שבת), which states that harmful substances don't require brachos, yet since one derives benefit (hana'ah), a bracha is warranted. This creates a contradiction with Rashi's position that harmful substances never require brachos.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does saying Ashrei three times daily guarantee a share in the World to Come? The verse 'umasbia l'chol chai ratzon' reveals that God provides not just sustenance but pleasure to all creation out of pure love. This recognition teaches us that even basic needs are expressions of divine chesed, creating the foundation for love-motivated service through both major and minor mitzvos.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Brachos 35b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Should one learn Torah full-time trusting in Divine providence, or combine learning with work? The shiur distinguishes between Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai's approach of complete separation from worldly concerns versus Rabbi Shmuel's view that proper work itself becomes part of Torah. The key insight: true emunah means learning without demanding sustenance from either Hashem or community, unlike having a 'contract' expecting payment for learning.
