No community start suggestion yet.
Why don't we apply safek berachos l'hakel when someone makes the wrong bracha and wants to drink? Rabbi Akiva Eger distinguishes birchos hanehenin from birchos hamitzvos, arguing that eating without a bracha violates an issur d'oraisa. The shiur challenges this approach through cases like an onen eating bread, revealing fundamental disputes about whether the prohibition stems from 'stealing' food or failing to acknowledge Hashem (ה׳)'s providence.
This shiur examines a complex sugya in Masechta Berachos concerning the halachic response to uncertainty about whether one recited the proper bracha. The case involves someone who held a cup of beer, thinking it was wine, and made the wrong bracha (borei pri ha'gafen instead of shehakol). The Gemara (גמרא) presents a fundamental dispute: The Rif holds we go l'kula - the person may drink without making another bracha, following the principle of safek berachos l'hakel. The Ri disagrees, ruling l'chumra - one must make another bracha before drinking. The Magen Avrohom raises a crucial question: Why don't we simply apply the standard rule of safek berachos l'hakel? Rabbi Akiva Eger attempts to resolve this by distinguishing between birchos hamitzvos and birchos hanehenin. For birchos hanehenin, he argues, there's an issur d'oraisa to eat without a bracha (based on the Gemara's statement that one who eats without a bracha is like a gazlan). Therefore, in cases of doubt, one cannot simply refrain from making a bracha.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does saying Ashrei three times daily guarantee a share in the World to Come? The verse 'umasbia l'chol chai ratzon' reveals that God provides not just sustenance but pleasure to all creation out of pure love. This recognition teaches us that even basic needs are expressions of divine chesed, creating the foundation for love-motivated service through both major and minor mitzvos.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Berachos 12a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Should one learn Torah full-time trusting in Divine providence, or combine learning with work? The shiur distinguishes between Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai's approach of complete separation from worldly concerns versus Rabbi Shmuel's view that proper work itself becomes part of Torah. The key insight: true emunah means learning without demanding sustenance from either Hashem or community, unlike having a 'contract' expecting payment for learning.
