A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) reward Pinchas for an act of zealotry that seems to contradict normal judicial process? A true kanoi acts from divine compulsion, not moral choice - he's sick to his stomach while doing what must be done. This transforms our understanding of kehunah and the judicial system in Eretz Yisrael.
The shiur addresses fundamental questions about the mitzvah (מצוה) of Zroa Lachayim v'Keiva (giving parts of slaughtered animals to Kohanim) that appears in Parshas Shoftim, seemingly unrelated to the parsha's judicial themes. The Gemara (גמרא) in Chulin explains these gifts commemorate Pinchas's zealous act - the foreleg for his hand that held the spear, the jaw for his prayer, and the stomach for where he struck Kozbi. However, this raises difficult questions: Why do all Kohanim receive this reward when only Pinchas acted? Why does this mitzvah appear in Shoftim rather than in Parshas Korach where other priestly gifts are mentioned? What was Pinchas's controversial prayer that the angels wanted to reject? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod about the nature of kanos (zealotry) based on the primordial relationship between Adam and Hashem (ה׳). Originally, Hashem intended humans to act not from moral choice but from divine compulsion - to be extensions of God's will like the hand follows the brain's commands. Adam's sin was choosing to become 'yodea tov v'ra' (knowing good and evil), preferring to make independent moral decisions rather than simply responding to divine will. This rectification occurred at Matan Torah (תורה) with 'Na'aseh v'Nishma' - accepting divine command before understanding.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Shoftim 18:3
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
How can sinas chinam lead someone to harm himself even more than his enemy? The shiur develops that sinas chinam requires self-hatred first — only someone alienated from himself will damage himself to hurt others. The Bar Kamtsa host and R. Zecharya ben Avkulas both exhibited this self-alienation, showing that proper anava restores love of both self and others.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
