A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What is the essential function of berachah - expressing gratitude or something more? The shiur develops a chiddush from the Gemara (גמרא)'s analysis of kodash lulav that berachah serves dual functions: gratitude for Hashem (ה׳)'s generosity and payment for permission to enjoy His world. This resolves why even heavily processed foods like bread require berachah despite human effort invested.
This Gemara (גמרא) shiur on Berachos 35a presents a sophisticated analysis of the nature of berachah through examining the Rashba's commentary and proposing an innovative third interpretation. Rabbi Zweig begins by reviewing the kashos (questions) on the Rashba's position that grapes (gefen) in the context of zayin minim (seven species) specifically refers to wine rather than the fruit itself. The fundamental difficulty with the Rashba is understanding how the Gemara can make a hekesh (analogy) between different sources when they seem to require different measures - one requiring sevia (satisfaction) and another requiring merely te'imah (tasting). The shiur's central chiddush (novel insight) proposes that the pasuk of kodash lulav is not establishing a new obligation to make berachah, but rather teaching us that berachah has a dual function. Beyond the traditional understanding that berachah expresses gratitude for pleasure received, the Torah (תורה) reveals that berachah also serves as a form of payment or permission to enjoy Hashem (ה׳)'s world. This insight emerges from analyzing how the pasuk places berachah alongside pidyon (redemption), suggesting they serve parallel functions in transferring ownership.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Berachos 35a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does saying Ashrei three times daily guarantee a share in the World to Come? The verse 'umasbia l'chol chai ratzon' reveals that God provides not just sustenance but pleasure to all creation out of pure love. This recognition teaches us that even basic needs are expressions of divine chesed, creating the foundation for love-motivated service through both major and minor mitzvos.
Should one learn Torah full-time trusting in Divine providence, or combine learning with work? The shiur distinguishes between Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai's approach of complete separation from worldly concerns versus Rabbi Shmuel's view that proper work itself becomes part of Torah. The key insight: true emunah means learning without demanding sustenance from either Hashem or community, unlike having a 'contract' expecting payment for learning.
Should one combine Torah study with work, or rely entirely on Divine providence through exclusive learning? The shiur analyzes the machlokes between Rabbi Yishmael and Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai, explaining that 'Bnei Aliyah' live above natural law where Torah itself becomes their reality. This connects to the difference between tzaddik gamor and tzaddik she'eino gamor regarding transcending physical limitations.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
