A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What connects all the characteristics Koheles attributes to a ksil - anger, putting others down, and asking foolish questions? The shiur identifies the common thread as a control syndrome, where the fool believes he owns his world rather than recognizing God's ultimate authority. This lens explains the puzzling connection between withholding gifts from kohanim and the sotah case - both stem from inappropriate attempts to control others.
Rabbi Zweig presents a fascinating interpretation of what defines a ksil (fool) in Koheles through the lens of control. Beginning with Koheles 7:10, which warns against asking certain foolish questions, he traces through various characteristics King Shlomo attributes to the ksil: avoiding thoughts of mortality while seeking celebrations, immediate anger, putting people down, and asking inappropriate questions. The core insight emerges from analyzing the juxtaposition in Parshas Naso between the laws of gifts to kohanim and the laws of sotah. Rashi (רש"י) explains that one who doesn't give gifts to the kohen will end up bringing his wife to the kohen as a sotah. This seems problematic - how can one person's sin cause another's punishment? Rabbi Zweig resolves this by examining the Hebrew term 'ma'akev' (withholding), which suggests not refusing to give entirely, but rather making the kohen return repeatedly before giving what is owed.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Koheles 7:10
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Navi
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Koheles 7:10 call asking why earlier generations had better circumstances an unwise question? Comparison-based thinking destroys personal growth by making others our standard rather than measuring ourselves against our own potential. The shiur connects this to Miriam and Aharon's lashon hara against Moshe, showing that such speech represents spiritual suicide by choosing stagnation over the challenge of becoming who we can uniquely be.
Why can you rent a car for money but not charge interest on a loan? Money has no intrinsic value - it's pure potential that only gains worth through the borrower's wisdom and effort. Charging interest therefore claims ownership over another person's mental faculties, which the Torah prohibits as a form of enslavement.
What does Koheles mean by 'don't be overly righteous'? Using Saul's misplaced mercy toward Amalek as the paradigm, the shiur develops the principle that compassion toward the spiritually disconnected reveals disconnection within oneself. This explains why such misguided compassion inevitably leads to cruelty toward the truly deserving.
Why did Hashem insist on giving us Eretz Yisrael rather than creating a new land for us? The shiur explores a Midrash that claims Hashem wanted to show His power by defeating our enemies. This creates an ongoing divine commitment to protect us in a hostile environment where the nations perceive us as thieves of their land.
Why did Shlomo HaMelech combine intellect, physical pleasure, and chukim after each approach individually failed? The shiur develops that humans must acknowledge both their physical nature and spiritual capacity simultaneously. Chukim (called "foolishness" here) teach us to act for internal meaning rather than external approval.
Why does Kohelet frame foolish words differently as beginning versus end? The shiur develops a yesod distinguishing empowering communication from controlling communication. Manipulation destroys human dignity by removing free choice, making it worse than giving bad advice that preserves bechirah.
How can Israel be both "black" and "beautiful" simultaneously, as described in Shir HaShirim? The shiur uses Rashi's insight to reveal a fundamental difference between divine and human relationships. While people focus on recent failures and forget past goodness, God sees Israel's essential beauty intact even after transgressions like the Golden Calf.
