No community start suggestion yet.
Should safek bracha be treated with stringency or leniency? The shiur analyzes the machlokes between Rav Kivega (safek bracha l'chumra) and the Rif (safek bracha l'kula). The key question becomes whether refraining from a blessing due to halachic uncertainty violates the prohibition of 'eating without a blessing.'
This shiur presents a comprehensive analysis of one of the most fundamental disputes in hilchos brachos - whether safek bracha (doubt regarding blessings) should be treated with stringency (l'chumra) or leniency (l'kula). Rabbi Zweig opens by examining Rav Kivega's position that safek bracha l'chumra, meaning when there is doubt about whether a blessing was said or which blessing is appropriate, one must either make the blessing or refrain from eating. This is based on the principle that 'asur lenasl bol maazeh bol bracha' - it is forbidden to eat without a blessing. The discussion traces this principle through several practical applications in Shulchan Aruch. The first case involves someone who intended to make 'borei pri hagafen' on wine but realized they were holding beer, creating uncertainty about whether their blessing of 'shehakol nidvar' was valid. According to Rav Kivega, this uncertainty requires making a proper blessing because one cannot eat without any blessing. The shiur contrasts this with the Rif's position that safek bracha l'kula.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does saying Ashrei three times daily guarantee a share in the World to Come? The verse 'umasbia l'chol chai ratzon' reveals that God provides not just sustenance but pleasure to all creation out of pure love. This recognition teaches us that even basic needs are expressions of divine chesed, creating the foundation for love-motivated service through both major and minor mitzvos.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Brachos 35a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Should one learn Torah full-time trusting in Divine providence, or combine learning with work? The shiur distinguishes between Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai's approach of complete separation from worldly concerns versus Rabbi Shmuel's view that proper work itself becomes part of Torah. The key insight: true emunah means learning without demanding sustenance from either Hashem or community, unlike having a 'contract' expecting payment for learning.
