A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What happens if someone recites evening Shema after midnight - do they say the blessings or not? The shiur develops Rabbeinu Yonah's two approaches to show that the answer depends on whether Shema's blessings are independent obligations or accessories to the mitzvah (מצוה) itself.
This shiur provides an in-depth analysis of Brachos 2a, beginning with an examination of the timing for evening Shema recitation and its blessings. Rabbi Zweig explores a fundamental disagreement between Rashi (רש"י) and the Rambam (רמב"ם) regarding the Mishna's statement about when various mitzvos must be completed by midnight. The Rambam maintains that sacrificial offerings (hekter chalavim v'eivarim) can be offered all night until dawn, with the Sages establishing midnight as a protective measure. Rashi, however, argues this isn't the Mishna's intent and introduces complex interpretations about the nature of the prohibitions involved. A critical discussion emerges around Rabbeinu Yonah's two interpretations of what happens when one reads Shema after midnight: either one recites Shema without its blessings, or there's no fulfillment of the mitzvah (מצוה) at all, yet one still recites both Shema and blessings. This leads to fundamental questions about the relationship between the mitzvah of Shema and its accompanying blessings. The shiur examines Rashi's position that sacrificial offerings mentioned in the Mishna apply throughout the night based on a separate Mishna in Megillah, creating what appears to be a contradiction with the simple reading of our Mishna. Rabbi Zweig analyzes the Gemara (גמרא)'s discussion of reciting Shema before nightfall in synagogue, which Rashi explains as learning Torah (תורה) rather than fulfilling the mitzvah. This raises questions about when and how one fulfills the actual mitzvah of evening Shema and its blessings. Tosafos (תוספות) adds complexity by questioning why, if one hasn't fulfilled Shema earlier, one wouldn't need to recite all the standard blessings when finally performing the mitzvah at night. The shiur explores the concept of semichat geulah l'tefillah (juxtaposing redemption to prayer) and whether this requires actual fulfillment of the Shema mitzvah or merely recitation of the relevant passages. Throughout, Rabbi Zweig demonstrates the intricate relationships between timing, intention, and obligation in Jewish law, showing how seemingly simple questions about when to recite Shema reveal profound principles about the nature of mitzvah fulfillment and rabbinic enactments.
Brachos 2a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does saying Ashrei three times daily guarantee a share in the World to Come? The verse 'umasbia l'chol chai ratzon' reveals that God provides not just sustenance but pleasure to all creation out of pure love. This recognition teaches us that even basic needs are expressions of divine chesed, creating the foundation for love-motivated service through both major and minor mitzvos.
Should one learn Torah full-time trusting in Divine providence, or combine learning with work? The shiur distinguishes between Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai's approach of complete separation from worldly concerns versus Rabbi Shmuel's view that proper work itself becomes part of Torah. The key insight: true emunah means learning without demanding sustenance from either Hashem or community, unlike having a 'contract' expecting payment for learning.
Should one combine Torah study with work, or rely entirely on Divine providence through exclusive learning? The shiur analyzes the machlokes between Rabbi Yishmael and Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai, explaining that 'Bnei Aliyah' live above natural law where Torah itself becomes their reality. This connects to the difference between tzaddik gamor and tzaddik she'eino gamor regarding transcending physical limitations.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.
