A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) prohibit accepting "lies" (Lo Tisah Shema Shav) when lashon hara can be completely true? The shiur develops a profound yesod: a statement can be factually accurate yet still be a lie if it creates a false impression of who someone really is. Isolating one negative deed from the totality of a person's character is sheker—and reversing this pattern, focusing on people's good deeds, is the key to achieving shalom and ending galus.
This shiur addresses the fundamental problem of lashon hara and its connection to the lack of shalom that keeps the Jewish people in galus. Rabbi Zweig begins by noting that the parsha of Terumah deals with building the Mishkan, which represents the divine presence dwelling among the Jewish people. Chazal teach that the Shechinah can only rest where there is shalom—even in a home, divine presence requires harmony between husband and wife. The Jewish people have been in exile for two thousand years because of sinas chinam, our inability to get along with each other. The shiur's central question emerges from a difficult Rashi (רש"י) on the pasuk "Lo Sisah Shema Shav" (Do not carry/accept a false report). Rashi explains this prohibition refers to one who accepts lashon hara, translating "shema shav" as "sheker" (lie). The Rambam (רמב"ם) similarly states this is a prohibition against speaking lashon hara. However, this presents a fundamental difficulty: we know from halacha (הלכה) that lashon hara applies even when the statement is completely true. If the prohibition only forbids accepting lies, how can it encompass the prohibition of lashon hara, which includes true statements? Additionally, this same prohibition includes a second application: a judge may not listen to one litigant without the other being present. Why is this also under the rubric of "not accepting lies"?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Terumah, Mishpatim 23:1 (Lo Tisah Shema Shav)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Mussar
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why are sins automatically forgiven for three categories - converts, those elevated to leadership, and those who marry - without any teshuvah required? The shiur distinguishes between soulmate marriages (which create complete identity transformation) and companion marriages, using Esav's third wife as the paradigm. When true soulmates unite, they literally become new people, explaining why sins are forgiven rather than merely sealed.
Why does the Torah emphasize Esav selling his birthright over his other sins like murder and adultery? The key insight is that "vayivez" means Esav despised himself, not just the birthright - reflecting devastating self-worth issues rooted in inconsistent parental love and unproductive time use. Poor self-image is worse than behavioral sins because it can't be simply repented from and blocks all growth.
What does it mean that Leah was 'hated' despite being loved by Yaakov? The shiur redefines hatred (sina) not as animosity but as having separate agendas - two people can love yet remain fundamentally divided in priorities. Yaakov's seven years of labor for Rochel exemplifies making your spouse your agenda rather than maintaining parallel lives.
Why does the Rambam place free will exclusively in Hilchos Teshuva rather than Yesodei HaTorah? The shiur argues that teshuva begins not with correcting specific sins but with recognizing that free choice grants us ability, not right—we must abandon the arrogance of self-centeredness and reposition Hashem at the universe's center. Only then can we achieve immediate closeness to Him.
Why is vidui (confession) the central mitzvah in Hilchos Teshuvah, rather than teshuvah itself? The Rambam distinguishes between teshuvah (establishing a prospective relationship with Hashem) and vidui (achieving kapara for the past). Vidui transforms the focus from self-improvement to recognizing Hashem as the "baal davar"—the injured party—and communicating directly to Him, which is what undoes yesterday's aveiros.
Why does the Rambam locate the essence of teshuvah in vidui (confession) rather than behavioral change? The shiur explores how vidui works even for shogeg (unintentional sin), showing that confession restores relationship with God even when one has pushed Him out of one's world. The connection between vidui and todah (thanks) reveals the deeper meaning of confession.
What does kapara really mean—erasing the sin or restoring the sinner? The shiur builds on Rambam Hilchos Teshuvah 1:3 to argue that kapara is not about making sins disappear but about going forward in a relationship with Hashem. The story of Yishmael read on Rosh Hashanah—"ba'asher hu shom"—teaches that the din focuses on who we are now, not on fixing the past.
