No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rosh Hashanah come before Yom Kippur rather than after we've cleansed ourselves through teshuvah? Rosh Hashanah judges our present identity through accepting Hashem (ה׳)'s kingship, creating a new relationship that transforms who we are. This new identity provides the basis for Yom Kippur's forgiveness — we're no longer the same person who committed those sins.
Rabbi Yeshaya Greenberg ZT"L addresses a fundamental question about the order of the High Holy Days: why does Rosh Hashanah, the Day of Judgment, come before Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement? Logic would suggest that we should first have the opportunity to repent and cleanse ourselves, then be judged afterward on a clean slate. The shiur begins by establishing that the Yamim Noraim are fundamentally about love and relationship, not punishment. Elul is characterized by "Ani ledodi v'dodi li" - a mutual relationship where Hashem (ה׳) does for us and we do for Him, emphasizing that even divine judgment stems from love, like a father disciplining his child. The core insight is that Rosh Hashanah operates on a completely different principle than a simple accounting of past deeds. Rather than merely tallying up merits and sins, Rosh Hashanah judges who we are in the present moment through our acceptance of Hashem's kingship (hamalachah). When we genuinely accept Hashem as our King and commit to being better servants, we establish a new relationship that fundamentally changes our identity. Notably, there is no vidui (confession) on Rosh Hashanah - we don't focus on past sins but on present commitment. The Gemara (גמרא)'s teaching that "a person only sins when a spirit of folly enters him" (ein adam chotei ela im kein nichnas bo ruach shtus) supports this concept. Our essence as Jews is inherently good; sins come from external layers that cover our true selves. Rosh Hashanah allows us to strip away these outer layers and be judged based on our authentic essence. This transformation provides the basis for approaching Hashem on Yom Kippur. Having established a new relationship and identity on Rosh Hashanah, we can legitimately ask for forgiveness - not because we want to escape consequences, but because the sins belong to our former self. The damage still exists and needs repair (which Yom Kippur accomplishes through kapparah), but we're no longer the same person who committed those acts. The concept of zichronos (remembrances) reinforces this theme. When we ask Hashem to "remember" us, we're asking Him to look past the surface to see our true essence, since Hashem doesn't actually forget anything. The Satan's inability to prosecute on Yom Kippur, versus his potential influence on Rosh Hashanah, illustrates this progression - once we've established our new identity, past accusations lose their power. Rabbi Yeshaya Greenberg ZT"L concludes by emphasizing that the entire period from Elul through Yom Kippur is about Hashem's love and His desire for relationship with us. The Rambam (רמב"ם) is cited regarding how the yetzer hara tricks us into believing we're beyond teshuvah, when in reality Hashem is calling to us with open arms throughout this period.
Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur themes
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How was Yitzchok comforted after Sarah's death through marrying Rivka? The Hebrew 'vayinachem' means both comfort and change of direction, revealing that healing comes through shifting focus outward. Depression and mourning are self-absorbed states; true comfort emerges when we channel our pain into caring for others.
How could Avrohom keep the entire Torah before it was given, including rabbinical laws? The key insight is that mitzvos represent eternal spiritual realities, not just historical commemorations, so Avrohom could access these truths through his genuine search. His entire 172-year journey—even his early idolatry—retroactively became service of God once he reached ultimate truth.
Why does the Gemara say Avrohom knew God from age three while the Rambam says forty, after describing his idolatrous past? The principle that baalei teshuvah transform past sins into merits explains how Avrohom's early struggles became retroactive mitzvos once he used that experience to reach other idol worshippers. Unlike Shem and Ever who lacked such background, Avrohom's difficult past became his greatest qualification for helping others.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
