No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Rambam (רמב"ם) list five separate tragedies for each of these fast days rather than having them occur together? The shiur develops a yesod distinguishing two aspects of our relationship with Hashem (ה׳): King versus Father. Shiva Asar B'Tammuz mourns the loss of divine service, while Tisha B'Av mourns the destruction of our spiritual home and Father-child relationship.
Rabbi Zweig presents an innovative analysis of the differences between Shiva Asar B'Tammuz and Tisha B'Av based on the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s description in Hilchos Taanios. He notes that the Rambam describes five tragedies on each day, but questions why certain events couldn't have occurred on the same day if Hashem (ה׳) controls history. The shiur develops a fundamental thesis: Shiva Asar B'Tammuz represents the loss of our ability to serve God as King, while Tisha B'Av represents the loss of our relationship with God as Father and our spiritual home. The Rabbi analyzes two different biblical sources the Rambam uses for the mitzvah (מצוה) to build the Beis Hamikdash - one emphasizing serving Hashem, the other emphasizing building 'for them' (livnos lohem). This leads to understanding the Mikdash as having two aspects: a place of divine service and a place that serves as our spiritual home. The tragedies of Shiva Asar B'Tammuz (cessation of the Tamid offering, burning of the Torah (תורה), placing an idol in the Heichal) all relate to the destruction of divine service - God as King.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Hilchos Taanios, Perek 5, Halachah 2
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Halacha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Can korbanos be brought when the Beis Hamikdash is destroyed? The Rambam and Raavad debate whether "Hashem es Mikdasham" creates a din of Avoda during Churban. Rabbi Zweig develops a distinction: the Rambam holds kedusha Rishona enabled both korbanos and tefillah; the Raavad holds only tefillah remains when the edifice is gone, since Hashem's presence endures even without a physical structure.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
Why does the Rambam rule that one may not violate even a shvus (rabbinic prohibition) on Yom Tov to obtain a shofar, yet permit shofar blowing on Shabbos Rosh Hashanah despite the gezeirah of carrying it to an expert? The Lechem Mishneh wrestles with an apparent contradiction: in Hilchos Shofar 1:4 the Rambam treats shvus like a full lav vis-à-vis the mitzvah of shofar, but in 2:6 he allows shofar on Shabbos even though it involves overriding both a lav and an asei.
When is a melacha on Yom Tov permitted? The shiur develops the Rambam's three-tiered framework distinguishing melachos that are food preparation itself (always permitted), food processing (permitted only l'tzorech achilah), and non-food melachos (always forbidden). The Magid Mishneh's explanation of "ho'il" emerges: intention cannot create a melacha where the act itself is inherently permitted.
