A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What role do shotrim (court officers) play in the Torah (תורה)'s justice system? Rashi (רש"י) limits their function to post-conviction enforcement, while the Rambam (רמב"ם) expands their role to proactive market regulation and social order. This reveals fundamentally different conceptions of judicial responsibility.
The shiur analyzes the verse 'Shoftim v'shotrim titen lecha' (Devarim 16:18) and the grammatical difficulty that bothers Rashi (רש"י): why does the Torah (תורה) use the singular verb 'v'shaftu' for both judges and shotrim, rather than separate verbs for each function? Rashi resolves this by explaining that shotrim are part of the judicial process - they enforce court decisions by hitting and binding defendants until they accept the judge's ruling. This makes shotrim an integral part of mishpat (justice), justifying the shared verb. The Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Sanhedrin presents a fundamentally different model. While agreeing that shotrim have sticks and straps and operate under judicial authority, he expands their role far beyond post-conviction enforcement. According to the Rambam, shotrim patrol marketplaces and stores to ensure honest weights, measures, and pricing, striking down those who engage in fraud or price gouging. This reflects a broader conception of what judges do - they don't merely adjudicate individual cases but are responsible for establishing and maintaining an orderly, just society.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Shoftim 16:18
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rosh Hashanah feel oppressive if we should serve God from love, not for reward? The shiur resolves this through Rashi's apparent contradiction: we must expect God's response without demanding payment owed. True love requires knowing the beloved will reciprocate from caring, not obligation, transforming judgment day into celebration of divine relationship.
Why do we owe parents gratitude when they had children for their own fulfillment, not our benefit? The shiur establishes that we owe hakaras hatov to anyone who benefits us regardless of their motives, since nothing is owed to us in the first place. This yesod explains why Og earned merit despite evil intentions and why gratitude creates ongoing obligation rather than closing accounts.
What makes marriage fundamentally different from partnership? The Torah defines marriage as eternal oneness rather than temporary partnership, evidenced by burial together, yibum obligations, and the teaching that sins are forgiven upon marriage. This oneness transforms both spouses into a merged identity that transcends death.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.